Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Tim F.'s avatar

My understanding is that the 1881 move to reduce the field's width and length was to accommodate Harvard's then desire to use Jarvis Field (even if that plan later changed); can you corroborate the validity of this?

Similar to why Camp's proposal to increase width of the field in 1906 was rejected due to Harvard's opposal / inability to use planned stadium (a different one) if the field was wider.

Lost Century's avatar

That's a great summary. Thanks for posting it.

1 more comment...

No posts

Ready for more?